Low Exergy Loss Chemical Engines
January 2006 - August 2008
Investigators
Christopher F. Edwards, Associate Professor; Kwee-Yan Teh, Shannon Miller,
Graduate Researchers, Mechanical Engineering, Stanford University
Objective
The objective of the proposed research is to enable the development of
ultra-high efficiency engines. These engines should convert a much
higher fraction of the theoretical exergy limits of their chemical
resources to work than the most advanced engines available today.
Background
Improving engine efficiency has long been an objective of engine
designers. First-law efficiency (work per unit fuel Lower Heating
Value) has improved from less than 1% before 1800 (the Savery and
Newcomen engines) to about 70% for compound fuel-cell/gas-turbine
engines under development today. However, most simple-cycle
engines—best suited for light-duty transportation since the cost,
complexity and size issues associated with compounding are avoided—are
less than 50% efficient. Spark-ignited (SI, gasoline) engine
efficiencies remain in the low to mid 30s, while small-bore
direct-injection (DI, diesel) engine efficiencies are in the mid 40s.
The generally low simple-cycle efficiencies in current engines can be
attributed to significant exergy destruction as well as loss to coolant
and environment (i.e., exhaust), all of which can be significantly reduced.
In the group's previous research for GCEP, they have shown that the engine
efficiency problem can best be viewed as one of exergy management. A
simple balance equation describing the evolution of resource exergy as
a working fluid is transformed by the engine may be written as:
Starting with an energy resource (e.g., the fuel) with total exergy Xinitial
(thermal and chemical), dX is a differential change in the amount of
exergy contained in the resource, and the δX terms are differential
amounts of exergy transferred into or out of the resource, or destroyed
by irreversible (i.e., entropy-generating) processes. Xfinal is the work-potential (exergy) that remains after the energy resource undergoes a complete engine cycle. High Xfinal
reflects the overall inability of an engine to extract exergy, thereby
leaving it in the resource stream after a complete cycle. The δXout
term consists of both exergy removed from the resource as work and
exergy transferred out due to inadvertent losses. The last term δXdestroyed emphasizes that any time entropy is generated, exergy is destroyed and cannot be recovered.
In today’s engines, a large part of the δXdestroyed is
a consequence of using an irreversible (unrestrained) approach to
chemical energy conversion. This loss is inherent with the use of
combustion reactions which by their nature generate entropy. It can
only be reduced by re-positioning the reactant state prior to
combustion (e.g., compression, which entails investing exergy in the energy resource δXin) or by switching the engine design away from unrestrained reaction to a restrained form (as is the case with the fuel cell).
Approach
The current research addresses the two logical approaches to achieving
engine efficiency: minimization of exergy destruction for inherently
irreversible (unrestrained) systems and development of new engine
designs using reversible (restrained) chemical reaction. In the former
case—the branch involving traditional combustion processes—the group
will build an experimental apparatus to demonstrate how repositioning
the reactant state can drastically reduce exergy destruction in
unrestrained reaction. In the latter case, additional theoretical and
analytical studies are required in order to understand the
thermodynamic design space in a systematic way.
Their previous work has shown that adiabatically compressing the
reactants to an extreme pressure is the best way to reduce combustion
irreversibility in a simply cycle engine. Entropy generation from the
combustion process is minimized when the reactant and product
thermodynamic surfaces are closest to one another, as shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1: Internal energy/entropy/volume thermodynamic surfaces for stoichiometric propane/air. The ideal, reactive Otto cycle is depicted by the black lines while an isentrope with products expanded to the thermal dead state (T0 = 300 K, P0 = 1 atm) is shown in red.
Extreme pressures present the classic problem of high heat transfer
rates familiar to all engine designers. The group will combat the loss of
exergy from the system due to heat transfer by drastically shortening
the time that the working fluid spends at the extreme state.
In the experimental portion of the program an ultra-rapid
compression/expansion machine will be designed and built in their
high-pressure laboratory. They anticipate a final design that includes
the capability to conduct a single cycle of the reaction process at a
compression ratio of >100:1 and at a rate that is an order of
magnitude faster than today’s engines. The apparatus will allow
tracking of the piston position so that indicated work can be computed
and will have optical access to permit qualitative and quantitative
probing of the thermal state and reacting flow conditions within the
combustion chamber.
The compression/expansion machine will be used to investigate the
extreme compression region of U, V in Figure 1. Various combustion
phasing strategies from DI-HCCI through Diesel combustion will be
investigated. Performance measurements and calculated quantities such
as indicated work, energy lost to heat transfer, and exhaust enthalpy
and composition will be measured over the range of operating
conditions. Schlieren-based visualization will be used to observe the
spatial structure of the combustion.
The analytical portion of the program will investigate the pathways
available to achieving high efficiency through reversible reaction
systems. The key development in this work so far is the recognition
that electrochemistry is not the only way by which a reversible
chemical engine can be constructed. Several hypothetical approaches and
engine configurations have been considered, but more work is needed to
bridge the hypothetical to that which is demonstrable and to lay the
groundwork for new technology options. The group will also consider how to
systematically organize the design space of compound-cycle engines. As
discussed above, if inadequate work extraction capabilities limit the
efficiency of simple-cycle machines, use of a compound-cycle strategy
can permit significant improvement by converting δX out to useful work.
Issued April 2006